marrying bundle and directive? (Re: [MERGE] Merge directive format 2, Bundle format 4)
Adeodato Simó
dato at net.com.org.es
Mon Jul 2 19:16:03 BST 2007
* Aaron Bentley [Mon, 02 Jul 2007 14:09:03 -0400]:
> * the second positional argument should be the public branch, not the
> output file
JFTR, `bzr bundle` does not take a second argument, only BASE; if errors
if a second argument is given. Output file can be specified with --output.
> I think that if the UI is significantly different, it doesn't make sense
> to use the same command name, because it won't behave the way people
> expect it to.
My point is that the UI experience of users would be the same. With the
above bit solved, the only remaining change would be the semantics of -r.
Which can be seen as an improvement, not as an interface-breaking change,
I think.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
It is by logic that we prove, but by intuition that we discover.
-- Henri Poincaré
More information about the bazaar
mailing list