REGRESSION in 0.17rc1, doing commit of files with unicode names.
mbp at sourcefrog.net
Mon Jun 18 04:22:49 BST 2007
On 6/18/07, Ian Clatworthy <ian.clatworthy at internode.on.net> wrote:
> Martin Pool wrote:
> > Yes, just reverting it like that is probably the way to go for 0.17.
> > Ian did you find it was much faster to go direct to stderr?
> It was faster going just to stderr, particularly on the initial commit.
> There was a long debate on buffering of messages, if we should bother
> and if we did, where to do it. That all got backed out because going to
> stderr removed the need for it (performance wise) and no-one agreed with
> me that it was correct semantically.
> I'm going to look at commit again as part of 0.18 so I'll revisit the
> whole logging & progress bar thing then. In fact, hopefully later today!
I have a long-delayed branch that changes us from using the Python
logging library, which seems measurably slow (though not dominant for
The way we test logging and rely on it while testing other things
makes this slightly complicated.
> I like Aaron's idea of stopping note() logging to the file at all. Is
> that an acceptable approach to have product wide?
Do you mean to .bzr.log, or are you talking about the effect of --quiet?
More information about the bazaar