Ian Clatworthy - is he coreworthy or not?

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 13:40 +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
>> On 6/6/07, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
>>> Well you need to be added to the 'core' group - those that can self-vote
>>> +1 in reviews - by Martin first, I don't know that thats happened yet.
>>> Other than that, I need to add your gpg key to PQM, and you need to
>>> install the bzr-pqm plugin.
>> People can be added to that core group by a consensus of people
>> already in the core, as far as I'm concerned.  My sense at this time
>> is that Ian is doing good work and should be able to vote on it or
>> merge it, but given his experience in the code should make sure to get
>> thorough review first, as seems to be happening here.
> 
> Cool, well Ian certainly has a vote of confidence from me for being
> added, and apparently from Aaron as well, so thats three.
> 
> Folk who have commit access, please speak up, I don't think 3 is quorate
> these days :).
> 
> -Rob

I'm of 2 minds:

1) We gave him the Release Manager role for 0.17. And anyone with RM should
have pqm access.

2) He is doing good work, but has not done so through a complete release.


(1) is sufficient for me to give him "core" status. He has spent a lot of time
to focus on the code (printing out pages and pages of hardcopy to read???).
I also trust that he won't +1 things unless he actually feels he understands
the code in question.

So I think that means we have 4 votes. We still need to hear from Alexander,
Jelmer, Wouter, ... Anyone else?

John
=:->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGZsmgJdeBCYSNAAMRAjSRAJ98bB3ZPMDBerF+8GBXdixej6D+DwCg2RXA
m0uJvcRDhB/QyMe69qT/G0M=
=cQJy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----