Weekly 0.17 release status - new dates

Vincent Ladeuil v.ladeuil+lp at free.fr
Thu May 31 18:51:27 BST 2007

>>>>> "aaron" == Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> writes:

    aaron> John Arbash Meinel wrote:
    >> At the sprint we defined a list of goals of what we
    >> consider *necessary* for a 1.0 release, versus what we consider *nice*.

    aaron> One of those was branding, and as we get closer to the release, we
    aaron> should talk about calling it 2.0.  That would certainly reduce confusion
    aaron> with baz.

As nobody talked about 2.0 lately I thought the idea have been

I agree with Aaron, calling it 2.0 and clearly explaining why baz
was abandoned will greatly reduce confusion.

Also, on IRC, marienz said that going 2.0 will really help him
managing the transition from bazaar (baz) to bazaar (bzr):
| May 30 20:14:43 <marienz> ability to have more than one version
| of the same package installed is a gentoo oddity, it just
| doesn't deal with the latest version not being, well, the
| latest version very well.


More information about the bazaar mailing list