[MERGE] Make 'missing' try the pushloc too

[Marius Kruger]

hi,
For me it makes sense to let missing fall back like: checkout branch ->
parent branch -> pull -> push
(or something like that)
The way I use bzr it does happen that I might have pushed to a branch
and afterwards do a missing (just to make sure)
and then it complains that it has no target branch.

I also miss --remember functionality in missing

regards
marius

On 4/16/07, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
>
> Robert Collins has voted -1.
> Status is now: Vetoed
> Comment:
> I dont think makes sense: missing is used as the way to find out what
> you have not grabbed yet - it shows 'unmerged/unpulled' revisions -
> using the push location is not intuitive or predictable. Using the
> /bound/ location as a fallback might be nice, though I'm ambivalent on
> that (I think an 'update --dry-run' or 'update --missing' might be
> nicer.)
>
> What prompted you to create this patch?
>
> For details, see:
>
> http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/request/%3C20070406161126.GW68920%40over-yonder.net%3E
>
>


-- 

I don't trust a Revision Control System with less than 5900 unit tests.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20070418/b2c7255a/attachment-0001.htm