[MERGE] selftest enhancements: --exclude, --randomize, --list-only

Martin Pool mbp at sourcefrog.net
Thu Apr 12 10:34:17 BST 2007


On 4/12/07, Andrew Bennetts <andrew at canonical.com> wrote:

> I think just supporting:
>
>     -x one -x two -x three
>
> for this and not commas or anything else would be ideal.  I'm happily ignorant
> of the infrastructural issues involved in making this work :)

I agree.  If Ian's patch lands and initially takes only one RE, and
then it can be extended to let you repeat -x by giving a list, then I
think avoiding a special case for commas here would be better.

-- 
Martin



More information about the bazaar mailing list