confusing messages

[Sam Steingold]

James Westby wrote:
 > On (28/02/07 12:07), Sam Steingold wrote:
 >
 >> $ bzr status
 >> pending merges:
 >>   Stefan Reichoer 2007-01-29 Applied minor fix for dvc-build.el from 
Sascha...
 >
 > This means that you have done a merge from the other branch, but haven't
 > done the last step of committing it. This step is required as you are
 > supposed to ensure that the merge happened as you wanted. You then make
 > a commit to say that you are happy with the current state and want to
 > carry on.

This appears to imply that I need to do "bzr commit" after "bzr update".
I did it and got:
$ bzr commit
Committed revision 137.
$ bzr missing
Using last location: http://bzr.xsteve.at/dvc/
You have 1 extra revision(s):

# this appears to imply that the master branch has 136 revisions,
# while mine has 137 revisions, which is not good.

------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 137
committer: Sam Steingold <sds at janestcapital.com>

# I am not! the committer is Stefan Reichoer !!!

branch nick: dvc
timestamp: Wed 2007-02-28 14:13:40 -0500
message:
     Stefan Reichoer 2007-01-29 Applied minor fix for dvc-build.el from 
Sascha...
$ bzr status
$ bzr merge
Merging from remembered location http://bzr.xsteve.at/dvc/
Nothing to do.
$ bzr update
Tree is up to date at revision 137.
$ bzr uncommit
   137 Sam Steingold     2007-02-28
         Stefan Reichoer 2007-01-29 Applied minor fix for dvc-build.el 
from Sascha...

The above revision(s) will be removed.
Are you sure [y/N]? y
$ bzr missing
Using last location: http://bzr.xsteve.at/dvc/
Branches are up to date.
$ bzr status
pending merges:
   Stefan Reichoer 2007-01-29 Applied minor fix for dvc-build.el from 
Sascha...


So, I am still confused: what do I need to do to shut "bzr status" up?


thanks for your detailed and informative reply!
Sam.