[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Access control]]

[Sabin Iacob]

Jeffrey Cunningham wrote:
> John Arbash Meinel wrote:
>> Jeffrey Cunningham wrote:
>>> John Arbash Meinel wrote:
>>>> Jeffrey Cunningham wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> That's funny - I replied off-list because it looked to me like you 
>>>>> had
>>>>> emailed me
>>>>> off-list! I even looked in the extended email header and could 
>>>>> find no
>>>>> sign of the list. I just looked again - there is nothing. I think 
>>>>> maybe
>>>>> the list server is set up incorrectly. Usually there is a List-Id:
>>>>> header and/or something like [bazaar-devel] in the subject, but 
>>>>> not in
>>>>> this case.
>>>> It isn't even in the CC: bazaar at lists.canonical.com ?
>>>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>
>>> If there is supposed to be a CC list associated with yours, I have
>>> reason to believe that the Exchange Server my mail comes through at
>>> Boeing might be stripping them in some cases. I've seen evidence of 
>>> this
>>> before, but it isn't consistent (although on this list it certainly has
>>> been). Sigh. I have no choice in this matter.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jeff
>>
>> All of my replies have been addressed
>>  TO: Jeffrey Cunningham <jeffrey.k.cunningham at boeing.com>
>>  CC: bazaar at lists.canonical.com
>>
>> So it does indeed sound like something is stripping off the CC from your
>> emails. This email I changed it to be directed to bazaar at lists and did
>> not include your email. To see if you get it correctly addressed. (Of
>> course, you may not actually get the email this time).
>>
>> John
>> =:->
>>
>>
>
> This came through alright, but it shows up as being from you 
> personally. Go figure.
>
> How difficult would it be to add something like List-Id: bazaar-devel 
> to the list emails?
>
> --Jeff
>

X-BeenThere: bazaar at lists.canonical.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8
Precedence: list
List-Id: bazaar discussion <bazaar.lists.canonical.com>


actually, mailman does add the headers... but a reply-to header would be 
good, anyway :)