[MERGE] bzr rm should delete the working file (Bug #82602)

Alexander Belchenko bialix at ukr.net
Tue Feb 20 17:49:01 GMT 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

James Henstridge пишет:
> On 19/02/07, Joseph Wakeling <joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net> wrote:
>> You could do this, or you could add it as a flag to bzr remove
>> (bzr rm -D for example, as John Whitley suggested).
>>
>> I personally think that using remove -D and rm -D is preferable for a
>> couple of reasons.  First, I really don't like the idea of having
>> "dangerous" commands which by default can result in data loss.
>> Requiring a flag means you can't do it by accident, you have to say,
>> "Yes, unconditionally, without question, I want to scrub this data."
> 
> A flag for rm/remove sounds good to me, but I'd suggest using "bzr rm
> -f" instead.  Both CVS and Subversion use -f or --force for "unversion
> + delete", so it seems silly to implement the same feature but pick a
> different name without a good reason.

Yes. Here the answer that Marius expect, I think.

- --
Alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF2zSNzYr338mxwCURApMBAKCQ/b9TBMXvZIY9YeMVESUQevRn0wCfR9LW
70X5Y9nUq/u01gIyAOVFI+I=
=mcu2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the bazaar mailing list