[MERGE] bzr rm should delete the working file (Bug #82602)
Alexander Belchenko
bialix at ukr.net
Tue Feb 20 17:49:01 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
James Henstridge пишет:
> On 19/02/07, Joseph Wakeling <joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net> wrote:
>> You could do this, or you could add it as a flag to bzr remove
>> (bzr rm -D for example, as John Whitley suggested).
>>
>> I personally think that using remove -D and rm -D is preferable for a
>> couple of reasons. First, I really don't like the idea of having
>> "dangerous" commands which by default can result in data loss.
>> Requiring a flag means you can't do it by accident, you have to say,
>> "Yes, unconditionally, without question, I want to scrub this data."
>
> A flag for rm/remove sounds good to me, but I'd suggest using "bzr rm
> -f" instead. Both CVS and Subversion use -f or --force for "unversion
> + delete", so it seems silly to implement the same feature but pick a
> different name without a good reason.
Yes. Here the answer that Marius expect, I think.
- --
Alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF2zSNzYr338mxwCURApMBAKCQ/b9TBMXvZIY9YeMVESUQevRn0wCfR9LW
70X5Y9nUq/u01gIyAOVFI+I=
=mcu2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar
mailing list