No subject

meaning change.


Shall we take this back on the list?

After I clicked send, I realized it sent only to you, I then forwarded it to
the list.
(seems Joseph also did this:)


Aaron
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFF1b9s0F+nu1YWqI0RAqbiAJwLh2x2gOPCotXH5SKpZbRIErJ78ACcDt8x
> gc/uR1pmNUIQBKlE/CaDRrI=
> =X/la
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 



I code therefore I am.

------=_Part_8041_1787186.1171644813677
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Aaron Bentley</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca">aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>Hash: SHA1<br><br>Marius Kruger wrote:<br>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Remove is a good choice for the &quot;unversion&quot; command because<br>&gt;<br>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1. People are already using it that way<br>
&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; they use &#39;rm&#39; that way too<br><br>Yeah, I know.&nbsp;&nbsp;Those people will lose, but at least not everyone will<br>have a formerly-safe command turn dangerous.<br><br>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2. It is an antonym of &quot;add&quot;.
<br>&gt;<br>&gt; this makes sense,<br>&gt; but IMHO if we are giving rm and remove different meanings,<br>&gt; we are opening the door to confusion and chaos.<br><br>Sure, but I think if we have a &quot;remove&quot;, it should not be more dangerous
<br>than the inverse of &quot;add&quot;.&nbsp;&nbsp;And if we have &quot;unversion&quot;, that implies<br>that we should have &quot;version&quot; also.</blockquote><div>:) <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
So I&#39;d actually be inclined to remove the &quot;rm&quot; alias, supply<br>&quot;del&quot;/&quot;delete&quot; instead.</blockquote><div><span style="font-weight: bold;">This looks safer to me, but then we loose the consistency with other version control systems like svn (I think, as I don&#39;t use any others:)
</span><br style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">From reading the other mails they would also rather not have this sort for meaning change.</span><br>&nbsp;</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Shall we take this back on the list?</blockquote><div>After I clicked send, I realized it sent only to you, I then forwarded it to the list.<br>(seems Joseph also did this:)<br>&nbsp;</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Aaron<br>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)<br>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - <a href="http://enigmail.mozdev.org">http://enigmail.mozdev.org</a><br><br>iD8DBQFF1b9s0F+nu1YWqI0RAqbiAJwLh2x2gOPCotXH5SKpZbRIErJ78ACcDt8x
<br>gc/uR1pmNUIQBKlE/CaDRrI=<br>=X/la<br>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><br><br><br>I code therefore I am.

------=_Part_8041_1787186.1171644813677--