Unhide 'bzr remove-tree'
jelmer at samba.org
Thu Feb 15 17:30:22 GMT 2007
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 08:26 -0600, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> IIRC, remove-tree was declared hidden, because we weren't sure what to
> call it. We now have had some time to work with it, and I think
> 'remove-tree' is a reasonable name.
> So can we apply this patch?
Yes, I think this is a sane name. The current behaviour is that which
I'd expect from a command with that name. +1
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20070215/07199d1c/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar