RFC: Machine-readable merge requests

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Nicholas Allen wrote:
> Would it make sense that a merge directive could have a bundle attached
> instead of a pointer to a branch?

Yes, and that's already part of the spec:

  A merge directive must provide a way to retrieve the revision, i.e. a
  branch location or a following bundle

Is there a way I could make this more obvious?

> Both approaches could be supported but
> the bundle approach would be useful when the branch to be merged from
> has no publicly accessible url.

Right.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF1FOx0F+nu1YWqI0RAjbwAJ4qZbONZW/tZq7u85tR8eVUt/DPkwCfU1Gv
46xaB8t4z8lODUD5XWpLCBs=
=3oAf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----