PQM is too queued
Martin Pool
mbp at canonical.com
Tue Feb 13 02:24:10 GMT 2007
On 12 Feb 2007, Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> wrote:
> John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> >>>Stick me behind other bzr requests-- that's sensible. Waiting 2.5 hours
> >>>for an unrelated request to complete is not.
>
> > Well, if that other project is Launchpad (which it typically is), I've
> > timed it as each submission taking approx 1hr.
> >
> > So if you are stuck behind 5 submissions, you are talking about waiting
> > 5 hours, not 2.5.
>
> So far, the queue has not moved since I submitted my request. So the
> "Now playing" request has been playing for 2.75 hours, at least. I have
> no way of knowing how long exactly.
>
> If we count the remaining 5 requests as 1 hour, then we're looking at
> 7.75. It's also possible that the remaining 5 will also take 2.75+
> hours each. I hope not.
>
> > I've mentioned it too, though my feeling was it may just be best to have
> > a separate pqm instance. Maybe running on the same machine, maybe just
> > running on a less powerful machine, since bzr doesn't take as long as
> > Launchpad to test.
It can rarely happen that pqm is in fact just jammed. I think this once
happened because the box was rebooted and something didn't restart.
Robert said that
<lifeless> it was disabled overnight by stub doing maintenance
its now running at regular speed
> Yes, some kind of separation would be nice, even if it meant using a
> slower box.
I don't see why a separate machine would be needed, maybe just a
separate email address for our merges going to a different pqm
configuration.
--
Martin
More information about the bazaar
mailing list