[MERGE] Branch format 6

[Martin Pool]

On 12 Feb 2007, Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> wrote:
> Nicholas Allen wrote:
> > 
> >> I'm not sure 'strict history' really conveys the meaning of this though.
> >> In that bug john suggests 'preserve_mainline' -- how is that for you?
> 
> > How about 'preserve_revision_numbers'? That's how it appears to the user
> > that the revnos don't change.
> 
> I don't like that because it seems too narrow.  For me, the primary
> thing is that it preserves the view I get from "bzr log".  The fact that
> it preserves revision numbers is secondary for me.
> 
> > Or maybe 'append_revisions_only' , 'append_revision_numbers' ,
> > 'keep_revision_numbers'....
> 
> Of those, I like "append_revisions_only" the best.

That sounds good to me too.

-- 
Martin