rfc: auto_user_id implicit bug

John Arbash Meinel john at arbash-meinel.com
Tue Jan 30 15:50:49 GMT 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 09:21 -0600, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> 
> 
>> And I'm guessing win98 may not have any concept of a username (since
>> IIRC you don't ever have to "login" to a win98 machine).
>>
>> My feeling is that if everything fails we just error out with:
>>
>> bzr could not determine a valid user name for you. Please set one with
>> "bzr whoami".
>>
>> That message isn't quite right, but it would be close.
>>
> 
> I agree. FWIW even win98 has the concept of user names - you can indeed
> login into a win98 machine (in fact, windows has been fairly solidly
> multi-user aware since 3.11).
> 
> Cheers,
> Rob

I believe you are able to, but it doesn't default to requiring it.

Either way, though. Obviously the builtin tools are failing us, so we
need to complain to the user. Unless we have another way to detect a
login name.

John
=:->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFv2lZJdeBCYSNAAMRArP/AKCdfNyGazSKhpwQOhGT+ZL4NsoFLgCg0YnQ
QIm0bvxe+G0zsYHvC4ObOV4=
=teHy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the bazaar mailing list