RFC: should nesting recurse up?

[Alexander Belchenko]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Aaron Bentley пишет:
> Hi all,
> 
> When I discussed by-reference nesting to a coworker, he suggested it
> should recurse in both directions: down into subtrees, and up into
> parent trees.
> 
> For example, given this layout:
> 
> tree/
> tree/subtree/sub-subtree
> tree/subtree2
> 
> (all these trees are nested by reference into their parents)
> 
> Committing in "subtree" would affect not only "sub-subtree", but "tree",
> and probably also "subtree2".
> 
> This is definitely the closest imitation of one big non-nested tree, I'm
> just not sure it's very useful.
> 
> What I want is the ability to commit in a subdirectory, and have that
> affect only the current tree, because each tree is its own unique
> project.  I can kinda do this by specifying a directory to commit, but I
> must always enter the root directory, if I want this behavior.  Which
> seems like a pain.
> 
> Of course, we can make the recursion type optional, if there's strong
> demand for both.

I think that ability of commit only in subtree should be preserved.
I.e. no recurse up by default, only with special flag.

- --
Alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFvFQnzYr338mxwCURAtviAJ4+CHpsma1e2mGoyR9BZyZWAhwkJQCfTwwQ
p5VomkTRPQ5w+mDE5Sx2rIE=
=1E9t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----