[merge] tags in repository

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 09:57 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> I think that we should have, in bzr.dev, a format called "experimental".
> That format would be guaranteed to work in any particular revision, but
> not to be compatible from one bzr release to the next, and not even have
> any guarantee that it can be upgraded.  I think that would give us room
> to play without requiring people to spend time making sure upgrades will
> work, and without needing to make a commitment to long-term support
> before it is merged at all.
Yes, I agree, that would be nice indeed. I guess that'd be the sort of
thing that KnitRepository2 is now. At least it'd prevent people from
sending in merge requests for things that change the repository format.

> Also repository.py is getting quite big and I'd like to split it
> per-implementation.
+1 on that idea. It's very hard to find anything in that file. 

Cheers,

Jelmer
-- 
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20070124/632207e7/attachment.pgp