merge in difftools?
Stephen Ward
sward.dev at verizon.net
Thu Jan 11 06:48:50 GMT 2007
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 2:54 am, Martin Pool wrote:
> Maybe it would be good to move difftools into a builtin diff --using
> option? It would fit with a 'batteries included' approach, and it's
> generally useful and at this point not really experimental.
>
> The code looks pretty clean though it does not seem to have automatic
> tests.
I have no objections to this, if others feel that this capability ought to be
in the core, although I think that's debatable; this sort of external-tool
integration always struck me as an appropriate use for plugins. Before this
can happen, however, I need to:
1. add automated tests
2. divide core capabilities (the '--using' option, general setup) from things
that need to remain user-extensible (the registration of known diff tools).
3. get the code properly reviewed.
and optionally look at folding in the merge-tool capabilities as well. So I
need to get a sense of how seriously people want this capability merged into
the core.
-- Steve
More information about the bazaar
mailing list