Lack of deprecation period for short option changes

[Wouter van Heyst]

On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:54:30PM -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> James Westby wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The recent short option changes seemed to go in without a deprecation
> > period. Was this intended? Was the SHORT_OPTIONS[] thing not meant for
> > plugins to use?
> 
> These changes break bzrtools shell, for example, because
> Option.short_name is no longer callable.  I think a deprecation period
> would be appropriate, unless there are overriding concerns.

+1 to adding a deprecation period.

Wouter van Heyst
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20070110/2478dfe8/attachment.pgp