John Arbash Meinel
john at arbash-meinel.com
Wed Jan 3 01:40:35 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Aaron Bentley wrote:
>>> v- I thought the whole point of passing "default" was because you wanted
>>> it to explicitly exist in the list. It seems you are changing it here,
>>> which means that if something changes the registered "default", it still
>>> won't use it.
> I'm hoping this will be a temporary problem.
> There's no legitimate reason to change the default. The code that does
> is old code that is just trying to create a particular format, something
> that is better-handled by doing TestCase.make_branch_and_tree and
> supplying a format parameter.
> With the registry in place, I can update the old code, then deprecate
I would think that plugins might want to change the default. You don't
>>> So other than wondering why you are hard-coding "default" +1.
> Does that make sense?
I'm not going to be very strict on this one. I think it is an
incremental improvement, even if I don't agree on all of the details.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar