[SPAM] Re: [PATCH] [0.13] Bug #74759

[Vincent Ladeuil]

>>>>> "jam" == John A Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> writes:

    jam> John Arbash Meinel has voted +1 (conditional).
    jam> Status is now: Semi-approved
    jam> Comment:

    jam> We need to support proxies, and this might even be a
    jam> sufficient enough regression that we need to create a
    jam> 0.13.1.

Not yet, the fix solves only part of the problem. I'm working on
it.

    jam> It would be nice to be tested, though we didn't have
    jam> proxy tests before.

Indeed. But the good news is that the testing infrastructure, if
done well, can be reused for testing redirection (basically we
need to create a new TestCaseWithTwoHttpServers).

    jam> So if you can have a proxy test *soon*, then this can
    jam> wait. Otherwise I would like to see it merged, and maybe
    jam> an 0.13.1 released.

Kind of same feeling here, I'll do my best with my limited
resources.

        Vincent