[PATCH] test_pack_revision_5 failure on Windows

[John Arbash Meinel]

Henri Wiechers wrote:
> Can someone with BB access update my patch to be superseded by
> Martin's millisecond one? I prefer it to mine and it looks like
> everyone else is happy with it.

It would seem that BB missed Martin's patch. It probably either came in
while BB was down, or Martin included the diff inline, and so it looked
like it was just a follow up post, not a real merge request.

However, since we agreed, I'll just try to merge it.

John
=:->


> 
> On 11/8/06, John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote:
>> Aaron Bentley wrote:
>> > Martin Pool wrote:
>> >>> John, how about just writing it out as milliseconds?
>> >
>> > I'd be more comfortable if this was just for new commits.  And what's
>> > the impact on testaments?
>> >
>> > Aaron
>>
>> Testaments are already restricted to 'second' resolution:
>>
>>  a('timestamp: %d\n' % self.timestamp)
>>
>> I'm fine with the %.3f to write it out as milliseconds.
>>
>> John
>> =:->


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20061111/dee7d2d6/attachment.pgp