VCS comparison table
J. Bruce Fields
bfields at fieldses.org
Thu Oct 19 18:14:09 BST 2006
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 10:01:33AM -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:58:48 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> > On the other hand, I think your revision identifiers are not as
> > permanent as you think.
> >
> > In the first place, it seems fairly common in the Git community to
> > rebase. This process throws away old revisions and creates new
> > revisions that are morally equivalent[1].
>
> Yes, rebasing does "destroy history" in one sense, (in actual fact, it
> creates new commits and leaves the old ones around, which may or may
> not have references to them anymore).
Note that the id's are still permanent in this case; they will never
(module some assumptions about the crypto) be reused. So a given id
points at one and only one object, for all time; it's just that we may
forget what that one object is....
> > In the second place, one must consider the "nuclear launch codes"
> > scenario.
>
> Sure. And git does provide tools that can do this.
So in this case you can certainly lose the launch codes. But you have
forever granted everyone a way to determine whether a given guess at the
launch codes is correct. (Again, assuming some stuff about SHA1).
--b.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list