VCS comparison table

[Jakub Narebski]

Charles Duffy wrote:

> Sean wrote:
>> You'll need a better example than that.  Git has supported a version
>> of Cygwin-compatible symlink support on Windows for quite some time.
>> And no plugins were needed.
> 
> The win32-compatible symlink support is not, in and of itself, the point.
> 
> The point is that core, pervasive functionality can be modified at 
> runtime, with no recompilation or installation of tools not included in 
> the bzr package itself, simply by dropping a directory into place. This 
> means that folks who don't have the skillset to merge three branches 
> together (say, upstream plus two different trees adding extra 
> functionality) and run a build can still install a few plugins to 
> enhance their copy of bzr (which was installed by their IT staff, or a 
> shiny click-through idiot-friendly Windows installer, etc).

You don't need plugins for that. Take for example git-svn (perhaps not the
best example, as it is Perl script; but Python although has compiled form
is script language at heart), which went AFAIK from external contribution,
to being in contrib/, to being in mainline (and in git-svn package).

About plugins modifying some core functionality: this is rather sign
of not attracting developers to do it in-core...
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git