[MERGE] Don't require Content-Type

[Robert Collins]

On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 17:52 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> writes:
> 
> > Thats in the BNF for HTTP. So 'message-header' is entirely accurate
> > as the name for a single header. As is 'header field', field, etc.
> 
> Damn them. They took away my windmill.
> 
> mumble mumble can't tell whether someone's talking about the message
> header or just one field in it grumble mumble

:)

To help a little, because there is *no* concept of 'all the headers
combined', I can state that they are never talking about 'all the
headers combined' unless they say 'headers' with an 's', or they dont
know what they are talking about ;).

There are interesting collections of headers, such as hop-by-hop headers
and entity headers, which can be factored out - but they always need to
be explicitly named.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20061017/fab70d49/attachment.pgp