VCS comparison table

[Jakub Narebski]

Linus Torvalds wrote:

>> > So there is seldom any real need or reason to actually have multiple 
>> > checkouts. But it certainly _works_.
>> 
>> But without .git being either symlink, or .git/.gitdir "symref"-link,
>> you have to remember what to ser GIT_DIR to, or parameter for --git-dir
>> option.
> 
> I'd strongly suggest that people who do this should actually do
> 
>         git clone -l
> 
> instead of actually playing games with symlinking .git/ itself or using 
> GIT_DIR. It means that the two checkouts get separate branch namespaces, 
> but that's really what you'd want most of the time. 

Or symlinking .git/objects (and perhaps .git/remotes and .git/branches).
BTW. wouldn't it be rather git clone -l -s? What would happenm on repack,
or on repack -a -d?

But it is true that there is no need to checkout different branches
to different working areas.
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git