[PATCH] make CSS for docs compatible with IE
Aaron Bentley
aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca
Tue Sep 26 12:51:49 BST 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Belchenko wrote:
> I make changes to font size declaration. This changes makes documents
> looks almost identical in both browsers. As example see attached
> ie-patch.png image -- how looks index.htm with new default.css in IE.
> body {
> background-color: #ffffff;
> - color: #303030;
> + color: #000000;
> margin-top: 50px;
> margin-left: 50px;
> margin-right: 50px;
> margin-bottom: 70px;
> font-family: Verdana, Geneva, Arial, sans-serif;
> - font-size: small;
> - line-height: 180%
> + line-height: 180%;
> }
>
> -/* p {
> - text-indent: 3em
> -} */
> +p {
> + font-size: 85%;
> +}
It doesn't seem like good style to set the font size for paragraphs,
because not all text falls in paragraphs, but all body text should have
the same base attributes. Is there a reason we can't set the font size
in the body, instead?
The other font sizes are given in em, which is relative to the parent
size, so I would expect the rest of your changes to be unnecessary if we
get the base font size consistent in IE and Firefox.
> -.literal-block {
> +pre {
> margin-left: 5em;
> color: #000000;
> - font-weight: normal;
> - background-color: #c1d1ff;
> background-color: #e5ecf9;
> border: 1px solid #888888;
> padding: 1em;
> - }
> +}
What's the reason for these changes? Isn't it better to style
literal-block than pre, since not all preformatted areas are necessarily
code examples?
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD4DBQFFGRRV0F+nu1YWqI0RAuVPAJiiR7CweHFb9/1zX2DgHZmDyaDaAJ0QCXgQ
U/Si1V3tHQcb1Y5Qdc2SPw==
=5Gm9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar
mailing list