push + bind in a single operation ?

[Erik Bågfors]

On 9/19/06, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy at imag.fr> wrote:
> John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> writes:
>
> > Perhaps:
> >
> > bzr push --make-checkout
> >
> > Would be reasonable?
>
> With the ambiguity that one doesn't know from the name of the command
> if the local branch or the newly created remote one will be the
> checkout.

Well, since pull + bind = checkout, it's only logical that push + bind
= checkin :)


> But "bzr push --make-local-checkout-of-remote" is probably
> overexagerated ;-) and I can't think of any better.
>
> BTW, this also raises the old question about whether "branch" or
> "push" should be used to create a new remote branche.

I'm a big fan of letting pull and push be each others opposites.  so,
I vote branch.

/Erik

-- 
google talk/jabber. zindar at gmail.com
SIP-phones: sip:erik_bagfors at gizmoproject.com
sip:17476714687 at proxy01.sipphone.com