[MERGE] remove has_key() usage
Aaron Bentley
aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca
Sat Sep 9 18:49:29 BST 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> Robey Pointer wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> Okay, so pychecker can bite me. :) I reverted all the '== None' stuff
>> to 'is None' and pushed it to the same branch:
>>
>> http://www.lag.net/~robey/code/bzr.dev.no_has_key/
>>
>> robey
>
> So I reviewed the actual changes, and I'm +1 on the cleanup.
>
> But I'll wait for another +1, because there is some discussion about how
> it penalizes long lived branches.
I will +1 it and deal with whatever merge conflicts result. But let's
not do a ton of these while nested-trees is outstanding.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFAv6p0F+nu1YWqI0RAmq5AJ0fQqMQ1XLpTWoQYtONybmwd7We/gCfTlP4
aK410DWUuUTDK89eMDYkWpI=
=iPrv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar
mailing list