[MERGE/RFC] Add dotted-decimal revision numbers to merge_sorted output

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:12 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>> So, if I understand correctly, the nodes appear in the order that they
>> were merged into the target revision, which makes them stable.  But
>> nodes which have not are not ancestors of a given revision have no
>> revno
>> with respect to that revision, because they were not merged by it.
>>
>> Is that right? 
> 
> completely.

Okay, so what you've described sounds good to me, modulo perfomance
implications, and assuming we can accept it as a revision specifier, in
the fullness of time.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFAKKR0F+nu1YWqI0RAu4gAJ9VSXAgXCH1CJa9QA9we340FRUM7QCfQCbx
fnT/SBHEdhDCdOiR6DJlBIo=
=MyKm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----