re-import lsprof.py

[Robert Collins]

On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 12:36 +0200, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
> 
> 
> Nevertheless, I think that in the long run (especially when Python 2.5
> comes out) it would be much nicer to support cProfile, since Python
> 2.5
> will ship that and people wouldn't have to install something
> separately.

I think that folk who are profiling should have the best toolchain we
can give them. As we support python 2.4, and dont plan to change that
for a good long while, allowing people to profile effectively on 2.4 is
quite important.

-1 from me for switching to cProfile until we drop support for python
2.4

+1 from me on giving an option to let 2.5 users get the same display we
do using the python included stuff.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060815/f560b4bd/attachment.pgp