bzr-gtk / gannotate / bzrk

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 07:47 +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> I'm a little confused about where these three plugins are concretely up
> to.
> 
> The bzrk package in dapper is apparently borked, and I'd like to arrange
> to clean this up in dapper-updates, and get it sorted and tracked for
> edgy and sid.
> 
> So
>  - who is maintaining bzr-gtk?
Some people are occasionally contributing patches (Aaron, Szilvester,
me), but there's not really somebody doing really active development.

>  - are you/they tracking bzrk/gannotate as upstream source, or have all
> the developers joined forces?
gannotate isn't really maintained at the moment, I'm not sure about
bzrk.

It'd help to trim down the number of GTK frontends. The fact that bzrk
is maintained in bzrk, bzr-gtk and olive is not really helping
development. I don't really mind whether bzrk and gannotate are
maintained as separate plugins, but it'd help if development was done in
one project only. 

Is gbzr still alive ? If not, can it be hidden or marked as abandoned?

>  - how do you feel about doing releases like Aaron does of bzrtools -
> one per major release of bzr (0.9, 0.10), linked somewhere on the wiki
> so that the distro maintainers can find the tarball?
Sounds great. I'd like to help out.

Cheers,

Jelmer
-- 
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060815/8ec25002/attachment.pgp