[RFC] Moving uncommited changes from a tree to another.
Aaron Bentley
aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca
Wed Aug 9 06:25:30 BST 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Would it be possible to just have a command that converts the current
>> uncommitted changes to a bundle, and another that applies a bundle to
>> the working tree without committing?
>
> I don't think that's possible without surgery on the bundle code,
> because it assumes you're talking about revisions.
It's the kind of surgery I'm keen on doing, because that gets us the
ability to do un-revert, too, and maybe even improved versions of Shelf,
in the end.
> Aaron's 'shove' command is awesome, it works for me. I guess the only
> problem with it vs a bundle approach is you need both trees
> write-accessible at the same time. But it's a minor problem IMHO.
>
> Actually I think it should be in the core.
Aw shucks. Of course, the problem is trying to maximize the
functionality while minimizing the number of commands to learn. Shove
is a very single-purpose tool. But if other folks feel 'shove' should
go in core, I can prepare that.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE2XHK0F+nu1YWqI0RApNVAJ9i9ocMR5BX+E1PtJI+Blp70PxaggCfVeBX
ZlEG/G18Y6KmTRN4wnraiA8=
=O8BX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar
mailing list