[BUG?] uncommit and pending merges
John Arbash Meinel
john at arbash-meinel.com
Tue Aug 8 01:25:23 BST 2006
Robert Collins wrote:
> Uncommit does not seem to do ancestry-de-duplication of pending merges.
> That is, if I uncommit two revisions, and the -1 merged branch B, and
> the -2 one merge branch B a commit earlier, then I should only get one
> pending merge - the one from the -1 revision.
Well, it didn't used to keep track of pending merges at all :)
But you are correct, it could keep track, and only add 1 pending merge
for each revision_id.
The only other issue is that I thought it would be good to preserve the
order of the pending merges. So it isn't as simple as just using a set.
(I don't know if the order matters, but it seems more the 'right' thing
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060807/de243251/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar