[MERGE REVIEW] Use InventoryDirectory to represent tree root
Aaron Bentley
aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca
Tue Aug 8 00:20:56 BST 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Collins wrote:
>> Doesn't iter_entries now yield the root entry?
>
> Yes, but its always first, so it can be skipped trivially.
And it won't work properly in nested-trees. is_root isn't a YAGNI. I
already need it. It's just a question of when it should enter the
mainline. It seems rather pointless to reimplement this stuff to get
rid of is_root, which is a nice, clear method.
>> These all assume that a tree has one root directory, which is not true
>> in nested-trees, where this came from.
>
> I dont quite follow. In nested trees AIUI there is still only one root
> for a given tree.
No, in my nested-trees branch, sometimes there is no root for a given tree.
>>> self.root is a property - its never None, so theres no need to check for
>>> that.
>> It is sometimes None in nested-trees, where this came from.
>
> I can understand that - but at this point we haven't gotten that part of
> the code reviewed and agreed to. I think we're [you and I] still in
> discussion about that. I'm not going -1 this bit of code here because
> its basically harmless, but I would prefer the check for None not come
> in until the root is allowed to be None.
I don't understand why you'd object to making the code more robust than
it needs to be. I also have tests to ensure that the merge code can
handle file-type changes suitably. Should I also remove them?
>>> We dont use textinv.py at all - perhaps we should delete it?
I would be happy to delete it.
> Then I'd prefer that we implement the change to use InventoryDirectory
> to represent the tree root without having is_root at this point - if we
> needed it when the origin revision's changes come in, we can add it
> then.
The attached patch does as you request. I've made suitable arrangements
so that is_root isn't lost in nested-trees.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE18rY0F+nu1YWqI0RAth+AKCFLSnJpL2bNOnjFKoAYAXg8593QgCfRDWJ
EeE7+PrK6rub2Y/oKWKYOv8=
=Uyi0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: no-special-root.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 11774 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060807/ed930997/attachment.bin
More information about the bazaar
mailing list