[MERGE] Re: Implementation and tests for -r revno:N:path
aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca
Thu Jul 27 15:53:01 BST 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Matthieu Moy wrote:
> John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> writes:
> I also think so, and my patch is relatively trivial and well tested,
> so there shouldn't be any problem.
Your changes look fine. +1
I think our handling of commandline parameters is due for an overhaul,
but until then, this plugs regression in diff.
I presume there are other commands that should support revno:x:y in a
non-tree/branch eventually, and it would be best to have a uniform way
of determining files/trees/branches/revisions all at once.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar