[MERGE] Makeing WorkingTree nicer to derive from.

[Robert Collins]

On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 13:33 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> 
> I disagree with the second part. It would break consistency with a
> given
> version of the program. (Especially a released version).
> I think changing the order of locking should at least be something
> that
> causes a test to fail, which a person can then fix. But shouldn't be
> something that happens quietly.
> 
> 
> If you are 100% set against the test, I'll survive without it. But I
> do
> still think it is useful.

IF we can test it using public interfaces, I'll happily support the
test. If we cannot test it using public interfaces, then in this case I
really feel its not something we want to have force-defined.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060718/54b47b78/attachment-0001.pgp