BUG: bundle testament: something wrong again

[Matthieu Moy]

Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> writes:

> Alexander Belchenko wrote:
>> As I understand another solution for this problem (and this was
>> discussed before, IIRC) is to make diff inside bundle only for review
>> and store *all* actual revision text inside base-64 encoded section.
>
> Yes.  This solution doesn't sit right with me, especially because it
> would require a binary section even when the bundle only has a single
> revision.
>
> It would also be possible to declare the line-ending type of each patch.

Indeed, in 99% of cases, the line-ending would be uniform. Perhaps
"merge" could assume uniform line-endings (it can see it in the base
revision of the file), and bundle-revisions could generate text-diff
only for uniform line-ending files, and use base64 for others.

Well, just an idea.

-- 
Matthieu