terminlogy shared, unified, integrated (was Re: Simplified Tutorial (alternatives to "init-repo"))

[Erik Bågfors]

On 6/29/06, Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jari Aalto+usenet wrote:
> > * Thu 2006-06-29 John Yates <jyates AT netezza.com>
> > * Message-Id: 4D87F853B8020F4888896B1507DC0F09827363 AT mail2.netezza.com
> >
> >>Just a thought:
> >>
> >>Instead of talking about "shared" repositories how
> >>about either "unified" or "integrated" repositories?
> > Yes, yes and yes! integrated sounds to my ear the most descriptive.
>
> Integrated and unified both sound like they mean that the repositories
> are part of the branches, not shared among them.
>

That was my first thought also.

Cheers,
Erik