[RFC] CURRENT_TREE_REVISION ?

[Robert Collins]

On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 09:44 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> 
> We've managed to avoid having a revision object for 'null:', why do we
> want one for 'current:'? 

code like 'log' wants to print revision objects - I think having a
Revision object for Null and for Working might make log simpler in that
regard.

Not fussed either way on this specific point.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060616/eef20a3c/attachment.pgp