[RFC][PERFORMANCE][PYREX][TIRED OF THESE YET?] *fast* walkdirs.
Robert Collins
robertc at robertcollins.net
Fri Jun 16 10:23:12 BST 2006
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 10:57 +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> > Why not do it this way: for some feature foo with an optional C
> > implementation,
> > have a foo.py that simply consists of:
> >
> > try:
> > from _c_foo import *
> > except ImportError:
> > from _py_foo import *
> >
> > Where _c_foo would be the "foo" module in C, and _py_foo would be
> > the pure
> > python fallback. Tests for "foo" can directly access both _c_foo
> > and _py_foo
> > modules to make sure they both pass. Callers of foo get the C
> > version if
> > available, and automatically get the python version if not.
>
> I prefer something like spiv's approach, or something along those
> lines. It doesn't seem that much harder and does mean that you can
> at least name the two modules, if we want to add tests that exercise
> both in the future.
Sure, we can do that. I dont understand your comment about adding tests
later though: we can always start with a .so and .py with the same name
and use our rename-supporting-VCS later to rename them to _c_ and _py_
forms when we decide to add those tests. Until we are writing those
tests I would call the glue file a case of YAGNI.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060616/24c90bb9/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar
mailing list