[MERGE] show_log with get_revisions

Robert Collins robertc at robertcollins.net
Mon Jun 12 17:07:15 BST 2006

On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 11:50 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > I think branch.lock_read() should always implicitly lock the repository
> > - we can add a new function if we want to not lock the repo -
> > lock_read_branch_only or whatever.
> Would this apply to WorkingTree also?  Having lock_write_tree_only would
>  make checkouts from http possible, which I think is a win.
> Anyhow, if that's our new policy, I'm happy to revert that part of the code.

Its not new - its locked all the objects since we split the tree/branch
and repos into different objects.

We can assume that a read_locked() object has read_locks or write locks
on all the objects it depends on. A write_locked() object has write
locks on everything it needs.

If we want to we can add an api for locking only the single object - and
I support doing that where it makes sense.

GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060613/bc99b8e9/attachment.pgp 

More information about the bazaar mailing list