[MERGE] show_log with get_revisions

[John Arbash Meinel]

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 10:05 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
>> Robert Collins wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 22:50 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>>>> This produces a 13% speedup in my tests, and should also make further
>>>> optimization possible. 
>>> I'll look at the rest of the patch shortly,  but I thought a quick
>>> subthread on 'can we have a benchmark for this please' would be good ;).
>>>
>>> A 10K revision tree may be a little excessive at this stage for this -
>>> but certainly a 1K revision tree with only a few files - say 1 subdir,
>>> and a file and symlink each in the root and the subdir - would be great.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>> Well, he has a 1k revision tree, which just has no changes throughout
>> the whole thing.
>> I think we could do a 1k tree with a few files, which changes each file
>> in turn. Something like:
> 
> That sounds good then...
> 
> How about some branching in the graph? Or do we leave this for a bit
> either way?
> 
> Are you +1'ing the patch ?
> 
> Rob

Which sounds good, the 1k with no changes, or the 1k with changes?

I'm still reviewing the rest of the patch, just thought I would mention
he does have a benchmark.

John
=:->


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060612/61424050/attachment.pgp