[MERGE] add performance tweaks.

[John Arbash Meinel]

Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On 6/11/06, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 22:34 +1000, Robert Collins wrote:

...

> 
> Yeah it hurts, and for enormous trees I'm not sure it's really useful.
> 
> I have this in my todo list from yonks ago:
>  - bzr add -q of a kernel tree takes ~30 seconds
>  - bzr add of a kernel tree takes 1.06m
>  - perhaps bzr add should just print the top level things that were added
>    and mention that directories are being recursed into
>  - then -v can select the current behaviour and -q can print nothing
> 
> But never got around to coding it.
> 
> cheers

Actually, I was wondering about queuing up 10+ entries, and then writing
them out with a 'writelines' call. That should decrease the overall
overhead (potentially by 10x, though more likely only some fraction of
that).

John
=:->


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060611/12953c23/attachment.pgp