Stupid but important remark about the website

James Blackwell jblack at
Mon Jun 5 08:30:10 BST 2006

On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 06:57:44PM -0700, Robey Pointer wrote:
> The current site is eye-watering in its ugliness.  I did actually  
> send jblack two variants of CSS files a few months ago, to fix some  
> of the worst bits, but I think they fell into a black hole.

Hey! That css setup cost me five hundred bucks out of my own pocket,
mostly because of the back and forth motion caused by someone that got

I only vaguely remember some sort of discussion about css from someone
right at about the time I left the company. Sorry for dropping the ball.
That discussion would have happened at the same time that I was packing
for londing and turning in notice.

> Any improvement would be welcome.  The current page kind of gives a  
> bad first impression.

I don't like it either.

My home page:   <a href="">James Blackwell</a>
Gnupg 06357400  F-print AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 

More information about the bazaar mailing list