[TERMINOLOGY] rename "changesets" to "revision bundles"

[John A Meinel]

Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Michael Ellerman wrote:
> | On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 21:01 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> |>So no, we're not doing quite the same thing as them.  I'd say it's close
> |>enough, though.
> |
> |
> | Hmm ok. It strikes me that bzr "cset/rset/vset/bundle/thingies" are more
> | like a hg export than a hg bundle.
> 
> Well, they're a superset of both, so it depends which characteristics
> you think are most important.  For me, that's the fact that they're a
> substitute for publishing branches.
> 
> Aaron

I agree with Aaron. 'hg bundle' is meant to be something that you can
transmit as a substitute for access to a branch. Which is what our
'thing' does as well. It just happens that we are also designing it to
be human reviewable. Which has the advantage that the thing you review
is also the thing you merge. Rather than looking at one thing, and
merging a different thing.

John
=:->


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060529/e3990e94/attachment.pgp