[RFC]: preparing for Blob storage
Robert Collins
robertc at robertcollins.net
Mon May 29 23:56:15 BST 2006
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 19:11 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> ...
>
> > There may be other conceptual changes required. What we are trying to do
> > is to prepare the code base now, for this in the future, with the
> > following guiding principals:
> > * we dont want any performance degradation
> > * we're not worried about getting it absolutely right, just close
> > enough that a blob repository plugin is possible.
> >
> > This email is essentially a heads up and solicitation for opinions on
> > this - is it reasonable to merge to the mainline as things are
> > completed, or should we treat it as a long lived feature branch?
> >
> > Rob
> >
>
> Well, since we just had a stable release, I think we can do the 'get it
> into mainline so it doesn't bit rot'. Unless you object, that is how
> Aaron and I are planning on handling Changesets.
I agree with both of these.
> But it depends how invasive it is going to be. If it was only minimally
> invasive, a feature branch can be maintained without too much
> difficulty. I think we would need the Revision api changes to be in
> core, though. So that plugins, etc can realize that they shouldn't be
> using those functions.
Somewhat dramatic I think. There are some larger refactorings to do to
make the api compatible with a blob concept.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060530/6840a0e1/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar
mailing list