[MERGE] test-progress-bars
Martin Pool
mbp at canonical.com
Thu May 11 02:24:22 BST 2006
On 10 May 2006, Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 08:02 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> >
> >>I don't like the idea, because you won't see skipped tests and failed
> >>tests this way.
> >
> >
> > Skipped tests are still visible in -v mode, and failed tests are all
> > displayed at the end of the test run with their tracebacks, as normal.
>
> The current display is nice and compact. To me, seeing
> success/skip/failure is more valuable than knowing exactly what stage
> we're at.
The incidental cleanups to remove cruft and make the library more
reentrant are nice anyhow.
To me the biggest drawback of using a progressbar is that it may obscure
any incidental output. There shouldn't be any, but if there is I'd want
to see it.
--
Martin
More information about the bazaar
mailing list