Public Impressions

[David Clymer]

On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 12:13 +0200, Erik Bågfors wrote:
> On 5/6/06, Matthew Hannigan <mlh at zip.com.au> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 08:30:39PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> > > How about just bz otherwise? Perhaps a confusion with bzip/bunzip ...
> >
> > I was going to suggest the same .. bz seems pretty good.
> >
> > IF you were going to change it...
> 
> No.  I believe two letter commands are not allowed into debian.   Look
> at how ee was named eeyes or something like that (electric eyes, when
> it existed).  So debian would have to rename it... to... bzr perhaps?
> 

No two letter commands apart from bc, dc, ar, ld, ps, id, mt, su,
etc...? ;o)

> Just keep bzr, it's not bad

I agree. bzr is really not a bad name at all.

-davidc
-- 
gpg-key: http://www.zettazebra.com/files/key.gpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060506/c8b4730e/attachment.pgp