[MERGE] support push without a working tree at the source.
robertc at robertcollins.net
Wed May 3 00:19:54 BST 2006
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 08:16 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 18:39 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> >> Robert Collins wrote:
> >>> This fixes bug 40474. I think push shouldn't need a source branch. Note
> >>> that you have to disable bzrtools to use this, its push needs an
> >>> analogous fix.
> >>> Rob
> >> +1 from me.
> >> I would also like to see "bzr diff -r 1..2 path/to/branch" not require a
> >> WorkingTree, since it means I could inspect changes made by other
> >> people, without having to actually have a checkout.
> >> But that is a separate thing.
> > Do we have a bug open on that ?
> > Rob
> Not that I know of. Is it something bugworthy?
Bugs are a great way to let developers know there is something faulty
that can be rectified. Its like a mega fix-up TODO list.
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060503/22e022fa/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar